Canadian ex-premier Harper: Bitcoin could displace US dollar

The former prime minister of Canada worries about the stability of the U.S. dollar and brings up Bitcoin as a possible alternative, among other things.

The attitude of high-ranking politicians towards Bitcoin and Co. is reserved in most cases.

Only a few publicly take pro-crypto positions. Cryptocurrencies are still written off as a threat to financial stability. Stephen Harper, who held the office of Canadian Prime Minister between 2006 and 2015, is different. Harper is now bringing Bitcoin, among others, into play as a possible competitor for the U.S. dollar.

When asked which types of currencies could take over from the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency, Harper replied during an interview with Cambridge House that both Bitcoin and digital central bank currencies are conceivable options. To be sure, the euro and Chinese yuan are the only sovereign currencies that can threaten the supremacy of the U.S. dollar, he said. But value fluctuations on the one hand and regulatory arbitrariness on the other eliminated both candidates in the race for the global reserve currency.

Rather, a basket consisting of gold, bitcoin and other assets could prevail as an alternative. Meaningfully, Harper said:

It’s hard to see what the alternative to the U.S. dollar is as the world’s primary reserve currency. Apart from gold, bitcoin and a whole basket of things. I think you’ll see the number of things people use as reserves increase, but the U.S. dollar will still make up the bulk of it.

In particular, he said, the steady development of digital central bank currencies will become more important in the future. These are superior to traditional fiat currencies for efficiency reasons, he said. In this respect, however, Harper fears an excessive concentration of power at central banks, which could slip into the role of bankers in the future and thus exceed their powers as a controlling body.

For billionaire Mark Cuban, you have a 99% chance of losing everything by investing in Bitcoin

He sees bubbles everywhere – Mark Cuban continues to denigrate cryptomonanias over and over again, while calling those who dare to invest in them „fools“. For this grumpy billionaire, the cryptosphere is a worse bubble than the Internet at the dawn of the 2000s. Will Bitcoin still find favor in his eyes?

Bitcoin and Ethereum: the only survivors in the rubble?

Billionaire Mark Cuban has gotten us used to his scathing criticism of Bitcoin (BTC), calling crypto investors almost fanatic believers .

It will come as no surprise, then, that he compares the current crypto bull market to a doomed bubble , like that of tech companies during the democratization of the Internet.

“Looking at crypto trading, I see it EXACTLY like the stock bubble of internet companies. EXACTLY. I think Bitcoin, Ethereum (ETH), and a few others will be like the few companies that survived the bursting of the internet dot-com bubble, and did succeed, like Amazon, eBay, and Priceline. . Many will not survive. “

It should be noted that it is already very charitable on the part of Mark Cuban to at least admit that Bitcoin and Ethereum would survive a new speculative bubble if it were to take place, but we should not ask him for more.

The phony cryptosphere’s “selling points”?

For Mark Cuban, it’s all about the supply and demand for Bitcoin and cryptos. For him, talking about Bitcoin as a solution to the devaluation of fiat currencies by inflation would only be a simple „selling point“ . Just like the scarcity of bitcoins elsewhere!

In another tweet posted a few minutes later, he explains that investors who take risks by investing in crypto-assets are „fools“ and have a „99% chance of losing everything . “

Where he is not entirely wrong in this second intervention is that the billionaire speaks in particular of those who contract debts to invest in crypto, with money that the latter can not therefore afford to lose . On this last point, we will fully agree with Mark Cuban: you should only invest in cryptos money that you can afford to lose and that you do not need !